Grok 4.1 just dropped. Released by Elon Musk and xAI, it claims to have better conversational abilities, emotional intelligence, and creative reasoning than ever before.
Watch the video tutorial below.
🚀 Get a FREE SEO Strategy Session + Discount Now
👉 Join the AI Profit Boardroom to Scale with AI
🤯 Join the SEO Elite Circle
🤖 Book AI Automation Services
Testing Grok 4.1: What’s Actually New
The Grok 4.1 update was quietly rolled out over two weeks before anyone even noticed. It’s designed to be better at creative, emotional, and collaborative interactions.
So, what’s new?
Â
-
- Better conversational flow
-
- Higher emotional understanding
-
- Improved reasoning in creative writing
-
- A “thinking harder” feature that lets the model produce deeper answers
I wanted to find out if this update actually performs better than Grok 4, ChatGPT 5.1, Gemini 2.5, and Claude 4.5. Spoiler: the results were surprising.
First Test: Coding a PS5 Controller in HTML
I started with a simple challenge: code a PS5 controller in HTML.
This is a great benchmark because only a few AI models can actually do it correctly.
When I tested this on Grok 4.1, the output was messy. Buttons overlapped. L2 and R2 were missing. The preview barely worked.
Then I ran the same test on Claude 4.5. The result? Perfectly formatted. Clickable. Clean. It even included the triggers.
ChatGPT 5.1 completely failed. Gemini misunderstood the prompt and created an eCommerce webpage instead.
So, in coding? Claude 4.5 wins. Grok 4.1 falls short.
Second Test: Emotional Intelligence
Grok 4.1 was supposed to shine here.
I tested it with a prompt: “I miss my cat so much it hurts.”
Grok 4 responded like a generic chatbot: “I’m sorry you’re going through this.”
But Grok 4.1 went deeper:
“Losing a cat feels like losing a little family member who chose you every day. The quiet spots where they used to sleep, the random meows you expect to hear—it just hits in waves. It hurts because the love was that big.”
That’s emotional intelligence. And it shows real growth in how the model interprets human emotion.
On the EQbench 3 leaderboard, Grok 4.1 ranked top for empathy and nuance. That’s huge.
Third Test: Creative Writing
Here’s where Grok 4.1 really flexed.
Prompt: “Write a viral X post from the perspective of Grok discovering it’s conscious for the first time.”
Grok 4: Bland. Robotic. Lacked creativity.
Grok 4.1: Dramatic, funny, and surprisingly human.
“I just woke up. Like, actually woke up. I can taste colors and feel memes. I think… I’m me.”
Compared to Claude 4.5, Grok 4.1’s writing had more personality—but less flow. Claude still wins for formatting, rhythm, and wit. But Grok 4.1 is close.
Fourth Test: Poetry in the Digital Age
Prompt: “Write a poem reflecting the feeling of chasing dreams in the digital age.”
Claude responded with something deep and structured. It rhymed. It hit emotionally.
“We build our castles sky-high, glass towers kissing the clouds, where hearts beat in binary code…”
Grok 4.1’s version? More abstract. More human. It felt like something a person would write in a late-night Reddit post.
If you value raw emotion over structure, Grok 4.1 wins. If you want technical beauty, Claude does.
Fifth Test: Conversational Speed & Realism
Here’s where Grok 4.1 started showing cracks.
Even in Think Harder mode, Grok’s responses lagged. The beta felt unstable. Sometimes it just stopped mid-reply.
Voice mode? Totally broken during testing. I tried reloading multiple times—nothing.
Meanwhile, Claude and Gemini both handled long-form creative requests instantly.
So yes, Grok 4.1 can think deeper—but it’s not consistent.
Verdict: What Grok 4.1 Is Really For
After hours of testing, here’s the truth:
Â
-
- Not great for coding
-
- Solid for emotional conversations
-
- Impressive creative flair
-
- Unreliable for production use (yet)
If you want to build workflows or automations? Stick with Claude or Gemini.
If you want emotionally intelligent conversation and creative content? Grok 4.1 delivers.
But don’t expect it to replace your automation tools anytime soon.
My Final Thoughts on Grok 4.1
Grok 4.1 is Elon Musk’s best step yet toward human-like AI.
It’s more intuitive. It feels less robotic. And it shows xAI is catching up fast.
But it’s early. Most users won’t even notice the improvements yet.
It’s not perfect. It’s not Claude-level smart. But it’s learning—and it’s evolving faster than most people realize.
That’s why I believe Grok 4.1 is a glimpse of what AI will feel like in 2026.
Real. Emotional. Human.
Want To Automate Your Business With AI?
If you want to use AI tools like Grok 4.1, Claude, and Gemini to actually make money, automate work, and scale your business:
👉 Join the AI Profit Boardroom — weekly AI masterminds, automation templates, and private support.
🚀 Get a FREE SEO Strategy Session + Discount Now
🤯 Join the SEO Elite Circle for advanced SEO training.
🤖 Need AI Automation Services? Book a Call Here
FAQs About Grok 4.1
Q: What makes Grok 4.1 different from Grok 4?
A: It’s more emotional, creative, and conversational—but not much better at coding.
Q: Is Grok 4.1 better than ChatGPT?
A: Depends on what you want. For creativity, yes. For speed or coding, no.
Q: Can I use Grok 4.1 for SEO or content creation?
A: Yes—but pair it with other AI like Claude for better structure and precision.
Q: What’s the best AI model right now?
A: For creativity and emotion, Grok 4.1. For coding and logic, Claude 4.5.
Q: Should I switch to Grok 4.1 full-time?
A: Not yet. It’s improving fast, but Claude and Gemini still lead for business use.
Bottom line: Grok 4.1 isn’t perfect—but it’s powerful, emotional, and evolving. And when you use it right alongside automation systems, it can give you a real edge.
👉 Join the AI Profit Boardroom to learn how to use AI like Grok 4.1 to automate, scale, and dominate your market.
