Everyone argues about which AI model is “best.”
I decided to stop guessing — and test them all live.
Four models.
One goal.
Real results.
Watch the video below:
Want to make money and save time with AI? Get AI Coaching, Support & Courses. Join me in the AI Profit Boardroom:
👉 https://juliangoldieai.com/0cK-Hi
Get a FREE AI Course + 1000 NEW AI Agents
👉 https://www.skool.com/ai-seo-with-julian-goldie-1553/about
Why I Did This AI Model Comparison
Most people only use one AI tool — and never test the others.
They stick with whatever’s trending and assume it’s the best.
But AI isn’t about loyalty.
It’s about leverage.
So I ran a full 1-hour livestream testing the top 4 models side-by-side on real projects — no scripts, no edits, just real results.
The goal was simple:
See which model could build faster, think deeper, and handle creative tasks without breaking.
The lineup:
- ChatGPT 5.2 (OpenAI)
- Gemini 3 Pro (Google)
- Claude Opus 4.5 (Anthropic)
- Grok 4.1 (xAI)
The Test Setup
I gave each model identical prompts, same constraints, and the same time limit.
We tested 7 real tasks that creators, developers, and entrepreneurs actually use AI for:
- HTML animation design
- PS5 controller UI recreation
- Kanban web app (drag-and-drop tasks)
- Personal portfolio site
- Snake game
- Retro driving game
- 3D aquarium simulation
Each model got 5–10 minutes per task.
No corrections. No second tries.
Just pure performance.
Round 1: HTML Animation (Winner – GPT-5.2)
Prompt: “Build a responsive HTML animation of a moving circle that expands when clicked.”
- GPT-5.2: Perfect. Clean HTML, inline CSS, smooth animation, no errors.
- Gemini 3 Pro: Close, but missed the responsive scaling.
- Claude 4.5: Tried to over-explain instead of coding.
- Grok 4.1: Generated creative code but syntax errors broke it.
Winner: GPT-5.2 (Fastest and cleanest execution)
Round 2: PS5 Controller Interface (Winner – Gemini 3 Pro)
Prompt: “Recreate a PS5 controller using HTML and CSS.”
This was a brutal test of visual structure and CSS layout.
- GPT-5.2: Good attempt, but proportions were off.
- Gemini 3 Pro: Perfectly recreated layout with gradient shading and proper alignment.
- Claude 4.5: Minimal effort, clean but basic.
- Grok 4.1: Fun attempt but messy CSS.
Winner: Gemini 3 Pro (Design accuracy + detail)
Round 3: Kanban Web App (Winner – GPT-5.2)
Prompt: “Build a Kanban app with draggable tasks and color-coded categories.”
- GPT-5.2: Delivered a functional app with HTML, CSS, and JavaScript — drag-and-drop worked perfectly.
- Gemini 3 Pro: Generated partial code; missed event listeners.
- Claude 4.5: Wrote pseudo-code instead of runnable code.
- Grok 4.1: Too minimal; failed drag feature.
Winner: GPT-5.2 (Usable, working product in under 5 minutes)
Round 4: Portfolio Website (Winner – GPT-5.2)
Prompt: “Create a modern portfolio site with hero section, about page, and contact form.”
- GPT-5.2: Delivered a responsive 3-section site, clean layout, and working contact form.
- Gemini 3 Pro: Slightly slower, but visually stronger.
- Claude 4.5: Too verbose. Design lacked polish.
- Grok 4.1: Simple site but lacked responsiveness.
Winner: GPT-5.2 (Balanced design + functionality)
Round 5: Snake Game (Winner – Claude 4.5)
Prompt: “Code a playable snake game using HTML, CSS, and JS.”
- GPT-5.2: Clean code but frame-rate lag.
- Gemini 3 Pro: Created logic but failed to display correctly.
- Claude 4.5: Executed flawlessly — classic snake game that ran perfectly.
- Grok 4.1: Creative twist but buggy.
Winner: Claude Opus 4.5 (Surprise comeback — great for game logic)
Round 6: Retro Driving Game (Winner – GPT-5.2)
Prompt: “Build a simple 2D driving game with speed control.”
- GPT-5.2: Completed game with road movement, speed, and scoring logic.
- Gemini 3 Pro: Tried 3D effects — broke visuals.
- Claude 4.5: Wrote pseudo-logic again.
- Grok 4.1: Overly creative output, nonfunctional.
Winner: GPT-5.2 (Practical + playable)
Round 7: 3D Aquarium Simulation (Winner – Gemini 3 Pro)
Prompt: “Build a 3D fish tank with animated fish using JavaScript and CSS transforms.”
- GPT-5.2: 2D representation only.
- Gemini 3 Pro: Full 3D setup with depth layering and object movement.
- Claude 4.5: Tried physics simulation — broke mid-render.
- Grok 4.1: Abstract art vibes but not code.
Winner: Gemini 3 Pro (Most visually advanced output)
Final Leaderboard
| Rank | Model | Strength | Weakness |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🥇 1st – GPT-5.2 | Fastest coder, most consistent output | Slightly weaker at design | |
| 🥈 2nd – Gemini 3 Pro | Great design and visual reasoning | Slower on multi-step tasks | |
| 🥉 3rd – Claude 4.5 | Logical and accurate | Overwrites with explanations | |
| 4th – Grok 4.1 | Creative, spontaneous ideas | Frequent syntax errors |
The Biggest Lesson From This AI Model Comparison
There’s no “best” AI model.
There’s only the best one for the job.
- If you want speed and structure, use GPT-5.2.
- If you want visual or creative design, use Gemini 3 Pro.
- If you want precise reasoning or analysis, use Claude 4.5.
- If you want wild creativity, Grok 4.1 surprises you sometimes — just not in production.
Smart creators don’t pick sides.
They stack models.
Why I Test Multiple AI Models
Because no single AI can do everything.
GPT builds the system.
Gemini makes it beautiful.
Claude keeps it logical.
Grok keeps it fresh.
When you combine them, you build faster, smarter, and at a higher level than anyone relying on one tool.
That’s what we teach inside the AI Profit Boardroom.
You don’t just use AI — you run it like a team.
What You Can Learn From This Test
- Speed matters. GPT-5.2 wins in raw execution.
- Reasoning wins long-term. Gemini 3 Pro’s creativity scales better.
- Clarity beats creativity when shipping products.
- Testing models > reading opinions.
Everyone online argues about performance — but until you build with all of them, you’ll never really know.
The 30-Day AI Model Mastery Plan
Here’s how you can copy my process and learn to master all 4 models fast:
Week 1: Learn GPT-5.2 — focus on coding, writing, and automation.
Week 2: Learn Gemini 3 — focus on visuals and workflows.
Week 3: Learn Claude 4.5 — focus on logic, reasoning, and writing.
Week 4: Learn Grok 4.1 — focus on creative experimentation and idea generation.
By Day 30, you’ll understand how each model thinks — and how to make them work together.
That’s what separates casual users from AI operators.
FAQs
What’s the best AI model right now?
It depends. GPT-5.2 for speed, Gemini 3 for visuals, Claude 4.5 for depth.
Is this an official benchmark?
No — it’s real-world, live, and practical.
Which AI model is best for beginners?
Gemini 3 Flash. It’s fast, free to start, and visual.
Can I use all of them?
Yes — most are web-based or API connected.
Do I need coding skills?
No. You can use these models visually through their interfaces.
Final Thoughts
After testing them all, one thing’s clear — AI isn’t slowing down.
Each model has its own strengths, weaknesses, and secret powers.
But together, they form the ultimate team.
So don’t pick one.
Learn them all.
Use them like tools.
Build systems that no single AI could ever match.
That’s how you win the next wave of automation.
Want to make money and save time with AI? Get AI Coaching, Support & Courses. Join me in the AI Profit Boardroom:
👉 https://juliangoldieai.com/0cK-Hi
Get a FREE AI Course + 1000 NEW AI Agents
👉 https://www.skool.com/ai-seo-with-julian-goldie-1553/about
