Everyone keeps asking which AI model is the best in 2025.
So I decided to test them myself.
Today I’m breaking down the AI Model Comparison 2025 — a live battle between GPT 5.2, Gemini 3 Pro, Claude Opus 4.5, and Grok 4.1.
Watch the video below:
Want to make money and save time with AI? Get coaching, courses, and support here:
👉 https://juliangoldieai.com/0cK-Hi
Get a FREE AI Course + 1000 NEW AI Agents
👉 https://www.skool.com/ai-seo-with-julian-goldie-1553/about
Why I Ran This Test
Every AI company claims their model is “the most powerful ever.”
But real operators don’t listen to marketing.
They test.
So I ran each model through five real tasks — coding, design, app building, and game development — and scored them for speed, accuracy, and usefulness.
What you’re about to see is a hands-on review of AI in action.
This is not theory.
It’s real output.
Round 1 — 2D Duck Animation
First challenge: build a 2D duck riding a bike in HTML.
GPT 5.2 created a colorful, interactive animation with speed controls.
Gemini 3 Pro delivered a simpler design but no controls.
Claude Opus 4.5 looked clean but lacked motion.
Grok 4.1 produced a broken layout.
Winner of Round 1: GPT 5.2.
It was fast, functional, and fun.
Round 2 — PS5 Controller Design
Next, I asked each model to code a PS5 controller in HTML.
Claude Opus 4.5 gave me a half-working interface.
Gemini 3 Pro looked okay but wasn’t interactive.
GPT 5.2 struggled a bit here — it worked, but the buttons weren’t perfect.
Grok 4.1 surprisingly did better this round with clickable elements, though layout was messy.
Winner of Round 2: Grok 4.1 (for once).
But the margin was thin.
Round 3 — Kanban Web App
I tested how each model builds a simple Kanban app (like Trello).
GPT 5.2 absolutely crushed this round.
It produced a working drag-and-drop web app with edit and delete features.
Gemini 3 Pro came second with a solid layout but no full functionality.
Claude Opus 4.5 was usable but basic.
Grok 4.1 again failed to load tasks properly.
Winner of Round 3: GPT 5.2 by a landslide.
Round 4 — Portfolio Website
This was the most realistic test for freelancers and marketers — a personal portfolio site in dark mode.
GPT 5.2 produced a clean, modern design with a working navbar and contact form.
Gemini 3 Pro was beautiful but static.
Claude Opus 4.5 messed up the colors (white text on white background — you couldn’t read it).
Grok 4.1 looked okay but broke in preview.
Winner of Round 4: GPT 5.2 again.
Gemini came close but lost points for usability.
Round 5 — Neon Snake Game
Final challenge: build a custom game — “Neon Serpent Gravity Shift.”
Gemini 3 Pro surprised everyone.
It built a fully playable, colorful game with great visuals.
GPT 5.2 looked good but was too buggy to play.
Claude Opus 4.5 broke instantly.
Grok 4.1 didn’t even load.
Winner of Round 5: Gemini 3 Pro.
It proved that speed and creative design are its strengths.
Bonus Challenge — 3D Aquarium
To push these models further, I asked for an interactive 3D aquarium.
Claude Opus 4.5 redeemed itself here with a beautiful, realistic aquarium featuring fish, lighting, and controls.
Gemini 3 Pro was stylish but buggy.
GPT 5.2 failed to load the interaction.
Grok 4.1 did not respond properly.
Winner of Bonus Round: Claude Opus 4.5.
Final Rankings
After five main challenges and one bonus round, the scores were clear:
1. GPT 5.2 — Most Consistent Performer
2. Gemini 3 Pro — Strong Creative Outputs
3. Claude Opus 4.5 — Occasional Genius, Often Glitchy
4. Grok 4.1 — Unstable but Interesting
In total points, GPT 5.2 won the AI Model Comparison 2025.
It was the most balanced in speed, accuracy, and usability.
What This Means for Creators and Agencies
This isn’t just a battle of tech.
It’s a roadmap for how you should use AI tools in 2025.
Here’s the truth: you don’t need to “master” one AI model.
You need to know which tool wins for which task.
A carpenter doesn’t use a hammer for every job — he chooses the right tool.
That’s the new AI skill: model matching.
The Lesson Behind the AI Model Comparison 2025
The best AI users aren’t the ones who memorize features.
They’re the ones who test fast and adapt faster.
Five minutes of testing can save five hours of fixing.
Testing is not wasted time — it’s time insurance.
Before building anything important, run the same prompt across three models.
Pick the winner.
Build once.
Ship fast.
Choosing Your AI Tool Stack for 2025
Here’s how I use them now after hundreds of tests:
GPT 5.2 for logic, coding, and complex workflow builds.
Gemini 3 Pro for visual tasks, dashboards, and UI generation.
Claude Opus 4.5 for long-form content and research summaries.
Grok 4.1 for quick creative ideas and social posts.
The winner isn’t “better.”
It’s just better for the job.
The AI Profit Boardroom Community
Inside the AI Profit Boardroom, you’ll learn how to use these tools to make money and save time.
We share weekly AI updates, prompt libraries, automation templates, and case studies from real entrepreneurs and marketers.
You can see exactly which AI tools I use, how I test them, and the systems behind my workflow.
Want to make money and save time with AI?
👉 https://juliangoldieai.com/0cK-Hi
Get a FREE AI Course + 1000 NEW AI Agents
👉 https://www.skool.com/ai-seo-with-julian-goldie-1553/about
FAQs
Q1: Which AI model is best overall in 2025?
GPT 5.2. It’s fast, accurate, and versatile across most use cases.
Q2: Is Gemini better than GPT for design?
Yes. Gemini 3 Pro has strong visual and UI capabilities backed by Google’s ecosystem.
Q3: Why did Claude Opus 4.5 perform inconsistently?
Claude is great for writing and research but less reliable in code generation and design.
Q4: Is Grok still worth using?
Yes — for creative prompts and social content generation, not for technical builds.
Q5: How do I learn AI model testing like this?
Join the AI Profit Boardroom for training on workflow testing, automation, and AI strategy.
Final Thought:
In the AI Model Comparison 2025, GPT 5.2 proved that clarity and structure still win over hype.
But Gemini, Claude, and Grok each bring unique strengths you can leverage.
The future isn’t about one AI winning the war.
It’s about you learning how to use them together to win faster.
