Qwen 2.5.1.2 vs Nano Banana Pro vs ChatGPT — The Ultimate AI Image Battle

WANT TO BOOST YOUR SEO TRAFFIC, RANK #1 & Get More CUSTOMERS?

Get free, instant access to our SEO video course, 120 SEO Tips, ChatGPT SEO Course, 999+ make money online ideas and get a 30 minute SEO consultation!

Just Enter Your Email Address Below To Get FREE, Instant Access!

If you’ve ever wondered which AI model actually creates the best images, this test will give you the answer.

Watch the video below:

Want to make money and save time with AI? Get AI Coaching, Support & Courses.
Join me in the AI Profit Boardroom: https://juliangoldieai.com/0cK-Hi

Today, we’re putting three models head-to-head: Qwen Image 2.5.1.2, Nano Banana Pro, and ChatGPT Image 1.5.

We’re comparing real-world prompts, not fantasy art.

These are tests you can actually use — banners, infographics, thumbnails, and edits you’d create for your business.


Meet the Models

Qwen Image 2.5.1.2 was released by Alibaba on December 31, 2025.

It’s completely open-source, runs locally on your computer, and it’s free.

No limits, no subscriptions, no API costs.

Nano Banana Pro, on the other hand, is built on Gemini 3 Pro.

It’s powerful and 4K-ready, but it’s cloud-only and can get expensive fast.

Then there’s ChatGPT Image 1.5, OpenAI’s latest image update — slower than Qwen but incredibly consistent with composition and text rendering.


The First Test: Creating a Banner

The goal was simple: “Create a professional banner for the AI Profit Boardroom.”

ChatGPT Image 1.5 produced a clean, brand-ready layout — fast, functional, and crisp.

Nano Banana Pro went for detail, pulling in gradients and lighting effects, but the render took longer.

Qwen Image 2.5.1.2 finished first, creating a solid banner that looked clean but slightly lower in texture quality.

The verdict:

  • ChatGPT Image 1.5 — Best overall design
  • Nano Banana Pro — Best lighting and effects
  • Qwen Image 2.5.1.2 — Fastest generation

Speed matters when you’re building content at scale, and Qwen crushed this round in time.


The Second Test: Infographic Design

Prompt: “Create a professional infographic on five steps to rank number one on Google.”

Qwen Image 2.5.1.2 generated a neat infographic with proper structure — keyword research, on-page SEO, link building, and more.

However, the resolution was softer.

Nano Banana Pro delivered a stunning layout with bright icons and perfect typography — exactly what you’d post on LinkedIn.

ChatGPT Image 1.5 added creativity and text variety but looked a little grainy in the background.

Winner: Nano Banana Pro.

Still, Qwen’s output was solid — and free.

For creators who want quick, usable visuals without cost, that’s a massive win.


The Third Test: Realistic Prompt Challenge

Prompt: “A man wearing a suit holding a sign that says ‘Hello World.’”

This is where Qwen Image 2.5.1.2 really surprised me.

It generated instantly — faster than both paid models.

All three produced good images, but Qwen’s realism and accuracy for a free tool stood out.

While Nano Banana Pro had more detailed lighting and ChatGPT nailed text clarity, Qwen matched both for composition at a fraction of the time.

Result: A draw.

Speed: Qwen wins again.


The Fourth Test: Image Editing

Prompt: “Make the suit rainbow-colored and make the person do a handstand.”

This round tested how well the AI could edit and follow instructions.

Only Qwen Image 2.5.1.2 understood the prompt correctly.

It gave the model four arms — hilarious, but still the only one that nailed both edits.

ChatGPT Image 1.5 and Nano Banana Pro struggled with accuracy.

Result: Qwen Image 2.5.1.2 wins this one.

Editing precision matters when creating marketing visuals — and Qwen proved it can actually follow complex commands.


The Fifth Test: YouTube Thumbnail

Prompt: “Create a thumbnail titled ‘Better Than Midjourney: Free AI Image Tool.’”

ChatGPT Image 1.5 dominated this test.

It produced the most clickable design — bold colors, clear typography, perfect spacing.

Qwen Image 2.5.1.2 came second with higher resolution but less flair.

Nano Banana Pro finished last because its textures looked grainy.

Result:

  • ChatGPT Image 1.5 — 1st place
  • Qwen Image 2.5.1.2 — 2nd place
  • Nano Banana Pro — 3rd place

Overall Results

After five rounds:

  • ChatGPT Image 1.5 won twice
  • Nano Banana Pro won once
  • Qwen Image 2.5.1.2 won once and drew once

That’s a major result for a free, open-source tool released only days ago.

Qwen didn’t just hold its own — it beat paid models in multiple real-world tests.


Why Qwen Image 2.5.1.2 Matters

Speed. Freedom. Accuracy.

It’s the fastest model I’ve tested for generating usable business images.

No logins. No cloud wait times. No monthly bills.

You can install it locally and start creating instantly.

It’s open source, so developers can improve it constantly — meaning the next update could outperform everything.

And when you pair Qwen with tools like Gemini or ChatGPT, you unlock full creative control: generate, edit, and refine in one system.


Learn the Prompts Inside the AI Success Lab

If you want all the exact prompts and notes from this comparison, check out Julian Goldie’s FREE AI Success Lab Community here: https://aisuccesslabjuliangoldie.com/

Inside, you’ll find detailed video tutorials, image prompts, and real-world automation workflows for creators and marketers.

It’s a free community with 40,000+ members who are already building, testing, and scaling using tools like Qwen Image 2.5.1.2, Nano Banana Pro, and ChatGPT Image 1.5.

You’ll see how people use them to design banners, infographics, and thumbnails — without paying for expensive licenses.


What We Learned

The AI image race isn’t just about big brands anymore.

Open-source tools like Qwen Image 2.5.1.2 are closing the gap fast.

For most creators, Qwen gives 80% of the quality for 0% of the cost.

Yes, ChatGPT Image 1.5 still produces cleaner visuals.

Yes, Nano Banana Pro offers 4K rendering.

But if you’re after freedom, flexibility, and raw speed — Qwen wins.

The open-source revolution is already here.


How to Start Using Qwen Image 2.5.1.2

Step 1: Visit the official repository or mirror site for Qwen Image 2.5.1.2.

Step 2: Download the model and follow setup instructions (it runs locally).

Step 3: Start prompting. Try “AI Profit Boardroom banner,” “marketing infographic,” or “YouTube thumbnail.”

Step 4: Compare it with your current tool.

You’ll see how shockingly fast Qwen performs.

And if you want my exact prompt list and automation workflows, join the AI Profit Boardroom today.

Join here: https://juliangoldieai.com/0cK-Hi


FAQs

What is Qwen Image 2.5.1.2?
It’s Alibaba’s open-source AI image model released in December 2025. It’s free and can run on your computer.

How does Qwen compare to ChatGPT and Nano Banana Pro?
Qwen is faster and local, while ChatGPT and Nano Banana Pro are more polished but cloud-based and paid.

Can Qwen be used commercially?
Yes. As an open-source tool, you can use it for business projects.

Is Qwen better than ChatGPT for images?
It depends. ChatGPT wins on visual polish; Qwen wins on speed, freedom, and control.

Where can I get the prompts and templates used here?
Inside the AI Profit Boardroom, plus full guides in the AI Success Lab.

Picture of Julian Goldie

Julian Goldie

Hey, I'm Julian Goldie! I'm an SEO link builder and founder of Goldie Agency. My mission is to help website owners like you grow your business with SEO!

Leave a Comment

WANT TO BOOST YOUR SEO TRAFFIC, RANK #1 & GET MORE CUSTOMERS?

Get free, instant access to our SEO video course, 120 SEO Tips, ChatGPT SEO Course, 999+ make money online ideas and get a 30 minute SEO consultation!

Just Enter Your Email Address Below To Get FREE, Instant Access!